BetCrown Sister Sites And Ownership

The short answer is that we could not verify a current BetCrown sister site in the strict sense of a brand with proven common ownership or control. What we can verify is a wider Anakatech-operated network around BetCrown. As checked on 5 October 2026, the UK Gambling Commission listed betcrown.co.uk as a White Label domain under Anakatech Interactive Limited account 48789, alongside nine other domains on the same account.

That is useful relationship evidence, but it is not the same as proving that every site has the same owner, account system, bonus rules or commercial controller. BetCrown also has a separate brand-side link: the UK IPO Trade Mark Journal lists INFINITE VISIONS SRL as applicant and representative for the BETCROWN mark. The public evidence therefore points to different roles rather than one simple “owner” label.

This page separates those roles and shows what can actually be proved. For the broader product, see our BetCrown casino overview.

BetCrown Sister Sites: The Short Answer

For this page, a “sister site” requires more than a similar design, shared platform or appearance on the same gambling licence. We use the stronger label only where common brand ownership or control is directly evidenced.

On that standard, we found no current BetCrown site that qualifies as a confirmed sister brand. The strongest current relationship is same operator / same UKGC account.

On 5 October 2026, UKGC account 48789 for Anakatech Interactive Limited showed these other domains in addition to betcrown.co.uk:

This gives a dated count of nine other domains on the same UKGC account, not “nine confirmed BetCrown sister sites”.

neptuneplay.com needs an extra caveat. The current relationship evidence also records the domain in UKGC search under AG Communications Limited account 39483. Without the relevant time or contract context, it would be especially weak to treat Neptune Play as a simple proof of one fixed sister-site relationship.

There are also historical brand-side links through INFINITE VISIONS SRL. Historical sources reviewed by GambleBallers associate that company with the now-closed Casiplay and PlayLuck projects. Those links are useful ownership context, but closed historical projects are not current BetCrown sister sites.

Who Owns BetCrown?

The BetCrown owner question is harder than it looks because the public evidence supports different answers depending on what “owns” is supposed to mean.

For the regulated GB-facing website, the verified operator is Anakatech Interactive Limited. UKGC account 48789 is registered to that company, and betcrown.co.uk is listed under the account as a White Label domain.

For the brand/IP side, the strongest primary evidence points to INFINITE VISIONS SRL. The UK IPO Trade Mark Journal published BETCROWN application UK00004367005, filed on 31 March 2026, with INFINITE VISIONS SRL named as applicant and representative. The filing covers gambling, casino, betting and related software/services classes, so this is a direct brand-related link rather than a same-name coincidence.

What that filing does not prove is ultimate beneficial ownership of the entire BetCrown gambling business. A trademark applicant can be highly relevant to brand control without being the licence holder, website operator or ultimate owner of every commercial layer.

So if the query is “who owns BetCrown?”, the most accurate answer is: the current operator is Anakatech Interactive Limited; INFINITE VISIONS SRL has the strongest verified brand/IP connection; ultimate ownership or control has not been independently established.

BetCrown And Anakatech: What The Relationship Actually Is

The BetCrown–Anakatech relationship is strong, but the exact role matters.

The current regulatory relationship is straightforward: Anakatech Interactive Limited is the UKGC account holder under which betcrown.co.uk appears as a White Label domain. That supports calling Anakatech the current UK operator/licensee layer for BetCrown.

It does not support saying “Anakatech owns BetCrown” as a substitute for ownership evidence.

A second Anakatech name appears in historical corporate material. An older Malta-registry dataset preserved by ICIJ lists ANAKATECH LIMITED as a shareholder of Anakatech Interactive Limited. That is useful historical context, but the dataset is historical and does not establish the current shareholder structure. We therefore keep the legal names separate and do not present the old shareholder record as a live ownership chain.

The role map is therefore:

BetCrown / betcrown.co.uk → White Label domain → Anakatech Interactive Limited account 48789 → current UK operator/licensee

Separately:

BETCROWN trademark → INFINITE VISIONS SRL → verified trademark applicant/representative

Those are two different evidence chains. They may be commercially connected, but we found no contract or corporate-control document that would justify collapsing them into one ownership statement.

For the detailed licence and regulatory position, use our BetCrown licence and legal status page.

How We Classify A BetCrown Sister Site

A flat “sister sites” list is easy to produce and easy to get wrong. We use an evidence ladder instead.

BetCrown itself is explicitly marked White Label in the UKGC domain record. Several peer domains on account 48789 have the same status. That is stronger than visual similarity, but it still establishes an operating/licensing relationship rather than a shared brand owner.

This distinction matters because “same operator” can be true while the brands have different trademark owners, commercial partners, account rules or contractual arrangements. White-label businesses are specifically the type of environment where those layers can differ.

Historical links require the same discipline. Casiplay and PlayLuck can be linked to INFINITE VISIONS SRL through historical sources, but that does not automatically prove that a former PlayLuck account, complaint history or commercial term transfers to BetCrown today.

The BetCrown Relationship Map

The relationship is clearest when the evidence is kept in separate layers:

A secondary source reports that the old PlayLuck site redirects to BetCrown. We did not verify that redirect directly, so it remains a historical relationship signal rather than proof of rebrand, succession or common current ownership.

That is the practical map: the current same-account network is verified at operator/licence level, the BETCROWN trademark creates a separate brand/IP link to INFINITE VISIONS SRL, and the historical Casiplay/PlayLuck evidence adds context without closing the remaining ownership gaps.

What A Shared Operator Or Licence Does — And Does Not — Mean

A same-operator relationship can matter, but it should not be used to transfer every rule from one brand to another.

Those gaps are important. A user-review source contains an allegation about cross-network account closures, but an allegation is not a current operator rule. We do not convert it into a factual statement about shared accounts or exclusions.

The same applies to safer gambling. A user should never treat another related brand as a workaround for an account restriction or self-exclusion. Where the scope of an exclusion or account control matters, the current operator terms and relevant regulatory framework must be checked directly.

Bonus eligibility also needs brand-specific evidence. A same-licence relationship is not permission to assume that welcome offers can be claimed independently across multiple domains. For BetCrown’s own current promotion conditions, see our BetCrown bonus terms.

Payment routes, payout handling and support can also differ between related brands. Use the BetCrown-specific pages for payment methods and withdrawals rather than importing another site’s rules.

What We Do Not Use As Ownership Proof

We do not classify a site as a BetCrown sister brand merely because it shares:

• a similar website design or navigation pattern;
• the same game providers;
• the same sportsbook or casino technology;
• payment methods;
• promotions with similar mechanics;
• support tools;
• analytics, tracking or technical fingerprints;
• the same UKGC account without separate ownership evidence.

These signals can be useful research leads, but they answer a different question. A shared platform can show shared infrastructure. A shared licence can show a regulatory/operator relationship. A trademark can show a brand/IP relationship. None of those should silently be relabelled as ultimate ownership.

That distinction is the main reason our list is shorter in certainty than many affiliate “sister sites” pages: we would rather use a weaker but accurate relationship label than manufacture a stronger one.

Where To Check Licence And Player-Reputation Details

This page answers who is linked to BetCrown and what type of relationship the evidence supports. It does not use those links to make a full legitimacy or reputation judgement.

For the current UKGC record, domain status and legal interpretation, see BetCrown licence and legal status. For Trustpilot, complaint themes and other player-feedback signals, use BetCrown player reviews and complaints. For our overall editorial verdict, see the full BetCrown review.

The practical conclusion is simple: the current evidence supports a BetCrown–Anakatech operator relationship and a wider same-account network, while INFINITE VISIONS SRL has the strongest verified link to the BETCROWN brand/IP side. It does not yet support a clean list of confirmed sister brands under one proven owner. That uncertainty is not a gap to hide; it is the most important ownership fact on the page.

18+. Gambling can be harmful. Set limits, avoid chasing losses and use safer-gambling tools if play is no longer under control.

Disclosure: Editorial concept, research direction and final approval by Lucky BetMastermind. ChatGPT by OpenAI assisted with drafting, structure and editorial refinement.